The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. Richard stallman created the gpl to protect the gnu software from being made. Some modules we make are using more permissive licenses, though, for example, the blender cycles rendering engine is available as apache 2. The gfdl is meant as a way to enlist commercial publishers in funding free documentation without surrendering any vital liberty. Can i use an lgpllicenced library in my commercial app. Other developers can rewrite the code freshly and release the software under true gnu gpl 3. The gpl license grants the users irrevocable rights to use, modify and redistribute software even commercially under the condition that software or its derivatives retain the gpl license and that the source code is included or. Im not clear on how that affects your products licensing. Gnu general public license v3 gpl3 explained in plain english. And the licensee may modify the software or use it in his own projects. Why should i use the gnu gpl rather than other free software licenses. The cover text feature, and certain other aspects of the license that deal with covers.
This is a condition of open source software licenses. Some other free software foundation software is covered by the gnu library general public license instead. If you want an example of including gpl d software as part of a commercial offering, look at os x. Can i link to a gpl library from a closed source application. Pages in category software using the gpl license the following 149 pages are in this category, out of 149 total. This general public license applies to most of the free software foundations software and to any other program whose authors commit to using. If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporate commercial environment. Gnu general public license, version 2 spdx short identifier. The implication is that gpled software is not necessarily free from cost. A techrepublic reader recently asked the following questions in the. Preamble the gnu general public license is a free, copyleft license for.
If you releasedistribute software using lgpld libraries, your software doesnt need to be covered by the gpl, but the libraries must retain the lgpl. Gnu public license is all but free and you should never use it. Ffmpeg is licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl version 2. What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses. Floss stands for freelibre and open source software. Creative commons, a nonprofit organization founded by lawrence lessig, provides a. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software.
Anyway, the common open source software licenses e. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it. The gnu general public license gpl, originally written by richard stallman, was the first software copyleft license to see extensive use, and continues to dominate in that area. This page is maintained by the free software foundations licensing and compliance lab. Section of the gnus agpl closed the gpl saas loophole by. If the concern is about intellectual property and software licensing, then the facts are. The apple public source licence is one that allows free software components to be interlinked with proprietary software, and as such is not compatible with products that also use components licensed under the gnu gpl. Describes the ability to use the software for commercial purposes. Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu project. Gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. Its built with and comes with an awful lot of gpl d software. Most would not unless theres more than just software.
Jun 20, 2012 you can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license. Feb 25, 2006 advocates of the gnu general public license gnu gpl like to perpetuate the idea that programs released under it are free as in speech, not free as in beer. May 27, 2016 a huge amount of useful software is freely available under the gpl open source licence. Sflc continues to conduct gpl enforcement and compliance efforts for many of its clients who release their software under the gpl, the gnu lesser public license lgpl and other copyleft licenses. Software as a service and gnu gpl licensing is not complex, the motto of the license is for disallowing the softwares to control the users and modify, distribute, develop, use the softwares with full freedom along with the other points written in the license. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source code becomes available to the community. The question is specific to using these tools to develop commercial software. However, businesses using gnu software in commercial activity, and people doing public ftp. On the mysql web site the exception is often abbreviated foss. Gpl the gnu general public license the gpl is a copyleft software licence 1 published by the usbased free software foundation. If i use gpl software in my application, but dont modify or distribute it, do i have to release my application under the gpl. In doing so, we have found that most violations stem from a few common mistakes that can be, for the most part, easily avoided. Mar 25, 2011 using octave in a commercial environment. If youre merging other software with it, the whole thing has to be under gplv2, so other people can use and distribute it as they like, and you need to provide source code.
Even the great gpllicensed softwares like mysql actually sell a different licensed version. Use an image under gnugpl in a commercial application. You can use any gpld software for commercial gain in general, too, of course. Gnu public license is all but free and you should never use it dev.
Hello, i work for a civil engineering company, and want to know if i can use octave for my work, such as producing graphs or solving sets of equations id have. Its a widely held belief that you cant mix gpl code and code covered by other open source licenses. By using the image, youd have to force your entire application under the gpl. Im not sure you would like to do that, as your entire application would have to be licensed under the gpl. In reading it, it is clear that usage of the gpl 2. Can gpl licenced software be used in corporate environments. If i use the gnu gpl, any version, then some people cant use it. The question is, why would someone buy it, if presumably, they can get it for free. Not at allthere are many other free software licenses. Gpl is the acronym for gnu s general public license, and its one of the most popular open source licenses. The gnu general public license permits making a modified version and letting the public access it on a server without ever releasing its source code to the public. Gpl compatible software is software whose conditions of propagation, modification and use would permit combination with gcc in accord with the license of gcc. Using lgpl library in a commercial java application hello guys. Apr 17, 2010 the agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint.
Mar 11, 2017 if the concern is about intellectual property and software licensing, then the facts are. In fact, the fsf maintainers of the gpl have harsh words for licenses that try to restrict use of the software in any way. The gpl granted recipients unfettered rights to redistribute software with the condition that the source code could not be kept secret. Gnu general public license software as part of commercial.
Gnu gpl and source control source code control lava. If that commercial application is what youre selling, then youre giving a copy of that software in exchange for money. May 11, 2017 a federal court has ruled that an opensource license is an enforceable contract. If you want to use something covered by a stricter licence, like the gnu gpl, you can use the gnu gpl library as part of a. You can support our efforts by making a donation to the fsf. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source. The question is specific to using these tools to develop commercial software the source or the binaries of the gpl licensed tool does not become part of the commercial software in anyway i do not want to modify the gpl licensed tool. The emacs general public license, a february 1988 version, a direct predecessor of the gnu gpl. The software that i am refering to is qgis which provides this description. Gpl software can also be modified without restrictions, as long as the modified software is kept private. Gplcompatible software is software whose conditions of propagation, modification and use would permit combination with gcc in accord with the license of gcc. Octave general using octave in a commercial environment. A more practical example say i link to a shared library which is gpled in a nongpl application, would that force the nongpl application to become gpled.
Can i use the gplv3 license for my commercial application. It is a specific implementation of his copyleft concept. A free program must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial distribution. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain. Gpl software can be used anywhere, without restrictions. Using code licenced under free software licences to build proprietary software is an easy way to quickly create what you want to build. Can i use a software tool licensed with gpl in commercial. Jun 15, 2012 free software or copyleft licensing seems to have got off on the wrong foot with business, which is surprising given its many commercial benefits. Advocates of the gnu general public license gnu gpl like to perpetuate the idea that programs released under it are free as in speech, not free as in beer.
If he conveys software that contains modified or unmodified components that are licensed in under the gpl, his own product is also subject to the gpl. In general terms, if you use gpllicensed code in your program that you wish to distribute to. Jun 21, 2016 this is a guest post from exygys long time counsel joseph morris. This is what the gpl s copyleft clause is known for. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. Software licensed under the gnu general public license is free software, and all software that builds on gpl licensed components is also free and must also be licensed under the gpl. Once a version of a library has been released to the public under a particular license, you will forever be allowed to use that version of the library under that license. You may discover, however that these terms do not work so well in your favor, since one of the terms prevents you from a.
We seriously hope so, and that is the reason for the gnu free documentation license. Gpl also does not limit commercial use, you just have. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components. If you use gpl code, your code becomes covered by the gpl and you cannot provide a license for it that removes the stritures of the gnu license. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain without selling the software. I have a concern of using gpl v2 and gpl v3 licensed software in commercial production environment. Can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changesdates of in source files and keep modifications under gpl. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or simply gpl is a widely used open source software license, originally written by richard stallman for the gnu project. The gnu gpl requires that when you use gpl licensed software to make. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license.
The source or the binaries of the gpl licensed tool does not become part of the commercial software in anyway. The saas loophole in gpl open source licenses whitesource. In the absence of distribution, a user is merely using the software, and since. Gpl is for freedom to the enduser of the software, not to the developer reusing the code. Gnu public license is all but free and you should never use it matteo joliveau oct 17 17 originally. We, the free software foundation, use the gnu general public license for most of our software. There is a project under the gnu lesser gpl license. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center.
For example, type the following command to find a copy of that file in your linux system for various items. Aug 26, 2008 sflc continues to conduct gpl enforcement and compliance efforts for many of its clients who release their software under the gpl, the gnu lesser public license lgpl and other copyleft licenses. Can i use gpl software in a com mercial application. Software licensed with any gnu license can be used and even modified. I wont modify anything from source code and the architecture of the system requires the use of a load balancer. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software filed on feb 25, 2006 by anthony disante 31 replies. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. If you intend to use the gpld software strictly within the company, you can make whatever changes you want. Does all gnu software use the gnu gpl as its license. Frequently answered questions open source initiative. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users. But one important thing to take care of is that the gnu lgpl covered library is dynamically linked, not statically mixed with the main application.
Why you shouldnt use the lesser gpl for your next library. This can be further shortened to gpl, when it is understood that the gnu gpl is the one intended. For example, if you write some software and release it under the gnu general public license a widelyused copyleft license, and then someone else modifies that software and distributes their modified version, the modified version must be licensed under the gnu gpl too including any new code written specifically to go into the modified. I happened to see gravityforms a paid plugin license and its gnu. The licensee may redistribute the software without any changes under the gnu gpl. Among other things, were often asking joe about software licensing issues. May 12, 2015 software as a service and gnu gpl licensing.
It keeps your code bona fide open source, so people who want to use and extend it noncommercially can do so without worrying about you at all. This does not mean tjhat you cannot sell the product, but it does mean that you must provide your licensees, on request, with its source code. More specifically if i use a gpl library without modifying it, and then distribute that library as an. Jul 24, 2018 in the absence of distribution, a user is merely using the software, and since the act of running the gpl code is not subject to the license, one does not have to share their modifications to the code. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. The result is that any software that uses any gpl open source component regardless of its percentage in the entire code is required to release. Why publishers should use the gnu fdl gnu project free. Lgpl software your api would be considered a derivative work and the new library would then be subject to the same compliance terms as the original software.
The text of the gnu general public license gpl is in a file named copying in various directories in your linux system. Software under the gpl may be run for all purposes, including commercial. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software to make sure the software is free for all its users. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis licensed under the gnu general public license. Honestly, i would try to avoid the gpl anywhere you can. When you are respecting the moral parts, the spirits of gnu gpl, others will respect you. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain without. You should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program. Qgis is an official project of the open source geospatial foundation osgeo. Dec 06, 2004 clarification of answer by maniacga on 12 dec 2004 20. Some features, such as support for some external libraries libx264 and libx265 for example and various filters, are covered by the gnu general public license gpl version 2 or later see commercial x264 license exception below.
Modification of l gpld components suggests contribution back to the creatormaintainer. It is therefore often thought that gpl licensed software is unsuitable for proprietary projects. The most widespread such license is the gnu general public license, or gnu gpl for short. Id also like to make it clear that it cant be used for military andor commercial uses. Jono bacon proposes the change is due to increased growth in open source in business, and a nervousness around the gpl in the commercial world. Some software licences are specifically designed to prevent people from doing this type of activity, such as the gnu general public licence gnu gpl. This general public license applies to most of the free software foundations software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software. This has implications for proprietary andor commercial software developers. I have licensed every piece of software i have ever written under the gpl, i have been. I would like to use haproxy as a load balancing solution. Nov 19, 20 marco fioretti answers a techrepublic members questions about charging fees for software thats made available under the gnu gpl license version 2 or 3. The implication is that gpled software is not necessarily free from cost, and therefore you can in fact license your programs under the gpl and still sell them for money. Can i use gpl software in a commercial application software.
This article gives an overview of the gpl and important issues for developers who may wish to incorporate gpl licenced code in their own programs. Using the ordinary gpl for a library gives free software developers an advantage over proprietary developers. Jul 02, 2015 gpl is the acronym for gnus general public license, and its one of the most popular open source licenses. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software definition. We recently had a discussion about whether to recommend mit, apache, or gpl to one of our nonprofit clients for their open source project. Using the ordinary gpl is not advantageous for every library. Using open source libraries with closed source software. Marco fioretti answers a techrepublic members questions about charging fees for software thats made available under the gnu gpl license version 2 or 3. The combined operating systemmost commonly called linuxwas released under the gnu general public license gpl, a licensing model that was created by richard stallman of the gnu project. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long.
See the gnu general public license for more details. Richard stallman created the gpl to protect the gnu software from being made proprietary. The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a free software license published by the free software foundation fsf. The fsf argues that free software should not place restrictions on commercial use, and the gpl.
The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint. The source code we develop at is default being licensed as gnu gpl version 2 or later. It should also be possible to exchange that dynamically linked library for an independently compiled build. Can a developer limit the usage of a commercial software.
931 273 1462 187 534 668 324 1338 401 809 984 197 262 761 368 862 253 691 386 942 761 895 377 133 145 613 109 1017 966 335 1217 1149 402 657 1497 895 835 285 27 401 269